My Role
UX/UI Designer – Took a key role in the website redesign, shaping the design in collaboration with the team and client
Team
Collaborated with UX Designer & UX/UI Designer
Client
Agora Connections
Project Timeline
November – December 2024 (6 weeks)
Who is the Client?
Agora Connections is contracting and consulting firm specializing in ERP, web development, branding, and process automation for small to mid-sized businesses.
The Goal
Improve the site’s structure, branding, and user engagement to better showcase Agora Connections’ services and help potential clients understand their value more easily.
Competitive Analysis: Learning from Industry Leaders
Since the client did not provide clear guidelines, I started by analyzing three competitors—Twilio, Vonage, and iWeb—to identify best practices and common UX/UI patterns. This analysis helped define key areas for improvement and informed our design decisions.
Twilio (https://www.twilio.com/)
✔ Strength: Effective Use of Icons & Graphics
❌ Weakness : Flat Visual Hierarchy
Vonage (https://www.vonage.com/)
✔ Strength: Comprehensive & Informative Content
❌ Weakness : Too Much Going On
iWeb (https://iweb-soft.com/)
✔ Strength: Clean and Modern Look
❌ Weakness : Overloaded Content Blocks
Understanding the Challenge: What Needed Improvement?
Beyond competitive analysis, I conducted usability testing with seven participants on the current website to identify key pain points.
Navigation Issues
Multiple CTA buttons ('Contact Us' & 'CALL US NOW'), causing confusion
Lack of clarity in 'Contact Us' placement and functionality
Lack of Information
Lack of detailed service breakdown
No clear pricing comparison
Unclear project timeline for different packages
Visual Hierarchy Problems
Inconsistent spacing
Repetitive images cluttering the layout
Weak Branding & Inconsistent Design
Generic visuals
Lack of strong brand identity
Low Engagement & Conversion Issues
Users struggled to understand services
Leading to fewer inquiries
Design Exploration: Two Initial Concepts Suggested for the Client
After identifying these usability issues, I explored different design directions to improve clarity, engagement, and brand consistency. To do this, I created two homepage concepts, each with a unique approach.
Concept 1
Real Photo-Based Design
Concept 2
Graphic-Based Design ✓
Collaborative Design Process: Individual Concepts
After choosing a graphic-based approach, our team of three UX and UX/UI designers each created different design versions to explore various ideas. We focused on different aspects of the user experience while keeping the main goals of the redesign in mind.
My Design ✓
Designer 1
Designer 2
Second Iteration: Refining the Design Based on Client Feedback
After reviewing the initial design, the client requested more detailed packaging and pricing information, as well as a stronger black color presence for a sleeker look. Based on this feedback, I made the following refinements.
These refinements enhanced both the visual appeal and usability, ensuring the design met branding and functional goals.
Updated Style Guide: Incorporating Blue into Branding
The client asked me to add blue to their existing brand colors. I updated the style guide to make the design look more modern and visually consistent. This change helped strengthen their brand while keeping it fresh and dynamic.
The Final Design: Approved & Ready
Following the final refinements, the client approved the design and requested its implementation on Squarespace. Our team handled the process of adapting the Figma design into a fully functional website.
Implementation Process
Built the approved design on Squarespace, ensuring responsiveness and functionality across desktop and mobile.
Adjusted layouts and elements to fit Squarespace’s constraints.
Worked to match the original Figma design as closely as possible.
Challenges & Outcome
Design differences → Some elements looked different due to Squarespace’s limitations.
Unexpected layout shifts → Certain sections didn’t align perfectly with the original Figma design.
Client decision → After reviewing the live site, the client decided to revert to the original version and worked with a developer to make further modifications.
Key Takeaways
💡 Design Flexibility → Learned that platforms like Squarespace have built-in limitations that can affect the final outcome.
💡 Client Communication → Keeping the client informed about possible design variations in implementation is essential.
💡 Problem-Solving → Even after approval, adaptability is key when working with third-party platforms.